“The big meat processors, by virtue of little competition, have more market power to name their price,” a senior White House official told CNN Business.
Skeptics say that the proposed solution may be too simplistic, and is unlikely to reduce prices — at least in the near term.
It’s true that the vast majority of the meat processing market is controlled by just a few players. But that’s been the case for decades, said James Mitchell, assistant professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness at the University of Arkansas.
“It’s been about the same for the last 20 years,” he said, arguing that consumers would have noticed price spikes well before 2020 if the highly concentrated industry was to blame. Others, including the US Chamber of Commerce, echoed that sentiment.
“It’s pandemic-induced labor challenges. It’s pandemic-induced logistical supply chain management issues,” Mitchell said. The recipients of the White House’s investment “are still going to face the same labor issues” he added. “So that’s not necessarily going to change, or fix the cost issue that consumers are facing at the grocery store.”
“Labor remains the biggest challenge,” Sarah Little, spokeswoman for the North American Meat Institute, a trade group that represents meat and poultry processors, said in an email. “Our members of all sizes cannot operate at capacity because they cannot employ a long-term, stable workforce.”
Higher demand has also led to higher prices, said Adam Speck, senior livestock economist at IHS Markit.
“The price increases are the result of exceptional demand for meat at home during the effects of Covid,” he said. On top of that, “Covid restrictions at plants (increased social distancing measures and safety protocols since Covid) are slowing the line speeds as well as increasing the costs for meat processors,” and contributing to higher prices on shelves.
Speck said that if demand stays elevated, “it could take well into 2023 for prices to normalize.”
A highly concentrated industry
Some welcomed the White House’s intervention.
“Industry consolidation has had a significant negative impact on rural America,” Scott Blubaugh, president of the Oklahoma Farmers Union, said in a statement. He added that he hopes the move will help “provide a more level playing field.”
Changes to the industry “will take time,” Blubaugh told CNN Business, adding that he thinks the move “will lower the prices eventually.” Overall, he called the White House’s plan a “game changer.”
But others say it’s not clear that more money will lead to a more competitive industry.
“I’ve done some research about this … trying to find out how markets will perform if there is what I call an intervention by the government,” said Azzeddine Azzam, professor of agricultural economics at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Azzam found that “investments that go to meat processors really are not going to make that much difference,” given the high concentration in the industry.
The government’s actions “will help in the medium term,” said the senior White House official. “Is it the case it will take a little bit of time for smaller and growing processors that we aim to help to gain market share? Yes, that’s clearly the case.”