Top Categories

Liz Cheney says it raises ‘concerns’ that Jan. 6 witnesses were contacted. Is it illegal?

Liz Cheney says it raises ‘concerns’ that Jan. 6 witnesses were contacted. Is it illegal?


  • Former prosecutors mentioned these contacts must be investigated.
  • “It is a crime to tamper with witnesses,” mentioned Jamie Raskin, D-Md.
  • Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., mentioned the committee has “very critical issues.”

Unnamed folks contacted witnesses about their testimony in entrance of the Jan. 6 committee and referenced being “loyal” and reminded them that former President Donald Trump “does learn transcripts,” according to the panel

Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., declined to call the witnesses however shared elements of their depositions throughout a committee listening to Tuesday. She mentioned they mentioned made these feedback after being requested whether or not “any former colleagues” had contacted them previous to their sworn testimony.

Former prosecutors and members of the committee who spoke to USA TODAY mentioned the communications must be investigated as potential witness tampering or obstruction of justice. 

A spokeswoman for the previous president didn’t reply to an emailed inquiry for remark. 

“It’s definitely sufficient to research additional,” mentioned Ann Rowland, who served as an assistant U.S. Lawyer within the Northern District of Ohio from 1980 to 2018.

“The vital phrase is ‘corruptly affect,’” Rowland mentioned, referencing the federal statute on witness tampering. “And so all of it kind of hinges across the definition of the phrase ‘corruptly,’ and that in all probability relies on the connection between the 2 people who find themselves speaking to one another.”

For instance, Rowland mentioned, it issues if one individual within the dialog has energy over the opposite individual’s political or monetary future.

Bombshells: What Cassidy Hutchinson said, what it means for Donald Trump

‘Good graces in Trump World’

Cheney mentioned the committee has heard from many Republicans who “testify totally and forthrightly” however contrasted their testimony with “proof of 1 specific follow” of concern.  

“Our committee generally asks witnesses linked to Mr. Trump’s administration or marketing campaign whether or not they’ve been contacted by any of their former colleagues who tried to affect or influence their testimony,” Cheney mentioned. “With out figuring out any of the people concerned, let me present you a few examples of solutions we obtained to this query.”

On the display, she confirmed excerpts from two witness statements.  

“What they mentioned to me is so long as I proceed to be a crew participant, they know I’m on the crew, I’m doing the correct factor, I’m defending who I would like to guard, you realize, I’ll proceed to remain in good graces in Trump World,” one witness mentioned.

“And so they have jogged my memory a few occasions that Trump does learn transcripts and simply to maintain that in thoughts as I proceed by way of my depositions and interviews with the committee,” that witness continued.

In a second instance, a second witness mentioned: “[A person] let me know you’ve gotten your deposition tomorrow. He needs me to let you realize that he’s excited about you. He is aware of you’re loyal, and also you’re going to do the correct factor if you go in to your deposition.”

Cheney mentioned after sharing the examples, “I feel most Individuals know that trying to affect witnesses to testify untruthfully presents very critical issues. We’re discussing these points as a committee and punctiliously contemplating our subsequent steps.”

After the listening to, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., acknowledged that Individuals are hungry for “particular person felony accountability” however mentioned that’s the jurisdiction of the Division of Justice, not the committee.

“It is a crime to tamper with witnesses,” mentioned Raskin, a member of the committee. “It’s a type of obstructing justice. The committee will not tolerate it, and we haven’t had an opportunity to totally examine or totally talk about it, nevertheless it’s one thing we need to look into.”

Mark Meadows: Trump’s chief of staff who defied Jan. 6 committee subpoena

Liz Cheney: Congresswoman calls Jan. 6 Capitol attack a ‘conspiracy’ and says threat is ‘ongoing’

Is what Cheney described unlawful?

Bruce Udolf, who was an assistant U.S. legal professional within the Southern District of Florida from 1987 to 1997 and who later labored on the Whitewater investigation of former President Invoice Clinton, pointed to a federal statute on witness tampering and mentioned it’s “just about a no brainer.”

“We all know what the true message is,” Udolf mentioned, referencing the messages about loyalty, “and for anybody to argue in any other case, that wouldn’t actually go the straight face check. It’s apparent. It’s apparent what these people have been trying to do. They have been trying to affect, if not intimidate the witness.”

Harassing a witness in an official continuing can carry three years in jail, Udolf mentioned, however knowingly utilizing intimidation “with intent to affect, delay or forestall the testimony of any individual in an official continuing” is a 20-year offense.  

“I don’t suppose the division has a lot selection on this case than to research it as aggressively as doable,” he mentioned.

Donald Ayer, who spent a few decade with the Division of Justice together with as deputy legal professional common, mentioned prosecutors would want extra info with the intention to decide whether or not obstruction of justice could possibly be charged and confirmed.

“You would want to get a full image of all of the information, and know precisely who did what,” Ayer mentioned. “Usually the hardest factor to show in a case like that’s the intent of the one who is likely to be charged with obstruction.”

E. Danya Perry, who served as an assistant U.S. legal professional within the Southern District of New York from 2002 to 2013, mentioned whereas it’s nonetheless unclear who made these contacts and to whom, she could be stunned if the committee didn’t make a felony referral for obstruction of justice or witness intimidation.

“Witness intimidation can definitely be made out of those type of insinuations and darkish premonitions and requests for a present of loyalty,” Perry mentioned. “The prototype is, ‘That’s a good looking face, disgrace if one thing would occur to it.’”

Trump and his allies have been accused of obstruction of justice in 2019. Greater than 1,000 former U.S. attorneys signed onto a letter saying Trump’s actions associated to particular counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian coordination with the Trump marketing campaign could be felony obstruction of justice towards any individual not protected by Division of Justice insurance policies towards indicting a sitting president. 

“You’ll be able to commit obstruction of justice with out saying to any individual, ‘I need you to lie for me or I’ll kill you,’” mentioned Aitan Goelman, a former assistant U.S. Lawyer for the Southern District of New York. “You may be much more refined about it and nonetheless be committing obstruction of justice.”

By the numbers: Who has been subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 committee?

‘Flamable’ testimony: Surprise Jan. 6 witness quietly drops bombshells

‘Mafia don’

Michael Cohen, a disbarred lawyer who labored as a lawyer for the Trump Group earlier than being sentenced to federal jail, mentioned he heard an echo within the witness statements Cheney shared.

“It’s the identical wording,” he mentioned. “Loyal. He loves you. Keep on message. You’re a part of the crew. It’s precisely what a mob boss does earlier than he offers the order to have you ever taken out.”

Udolf mentioned the primary instance — about “Trump World” — was rather more blatant than what one may usually see from somebody within the mafia. He mentioned that was stunning as a result of “normally people who find themselves doing which might be sensible sufficient to present themselves some cowl.”

The second instance Cheney introduced is “the everyday method mobsters speak after they’re trying to affect somebody,” he mentioned, “which on the floor could appear to be extra innocuous however in truth is extra typical of the best way that messages are despatched by people who find themselves trying to affect a witness.”

Goelman mentioned the idea of working for a “crew” and whether or not persons are “a pal of ours” are examples of mafia-like conduct. 

“Trump’s conduct has been in contrast, rightly so, to a mafia don again and again,” Goelman mentioned. “I don’t suppose any of that is actually new. It’s only a man appearing constant together with his character and the best way he’s all the time acted.”

Contributing: Katherine Swartz, Dylan Wells, Chelsey Cox. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.