Top Categories

Oversight Committee hearing is no vacation for Commanders owner Daniel Snyder | Opinion

Oversight Committee hearing is no vacation for Commanders owner Daniel Snyder | Opinion

Amid the clown-show moments of Wednesday’s listening to, there have been many indications that Commanders proprietor Daniel Snyder’s days of dodging accountability could also be over.


The alarm bells have been loud sufficient to be heard all the way in which in France.

Daniel Snyder may need thought he’d outsmarted the Home Committee on Oversight and Reform together with his fortuitously timed vacation, assured that Roger Goodell’s willingness to be a human defend for NFL homeowners and Washington’s incapability to withstand grandstanding and hysteria would stop something significant from popping out of Wednesday’s listening to. However amidst the clown-show moments, of which there have been loads through the 2½-hour listening to, there have been indications that Snyder – and the NFL – face serious trouble, and his days of dodging accountability might be over.

“A canopy-up on behalf of a robust proprietor,” committee chair Carolyn Maloney mentioned, “ought to matter to all of us.”

Snyder’s first downside is that Maloney doesn’t actually care if the Washington Commanders’ proprietor agrees that his group’s poisonous office is the enterprise of the committee or whether or not he needs to dignify its members together with his presence. He’s going to should, as a result of Maloney introduced through the listening to that she is going to concern a subpoena compelling him to testify subsequent week.

Which means Snyder must reply, underneath oath, questions in regards to the sexual assault allegations raised towards him in 2009 and the $1.6 million he paid to make them go away. In regards to the misogynistic habits he tolerated, and a number of other have mentioned he enabled, for years. About his efforts to intimidate former workers and subvert the NFL’s investigation. About his “exile” from his group’s operations.

Amongst different issues. Given some committee members used their 5 minutes of fame, err, time Wednesday to query Goodell about racism, perhaps some intrepid consultant can ask Snyder about that duplicate set of books he supposedly retains to cover cash from his fellow homeowners.

OPINION: NFL owners’ filth has stained Roger Goodell

No matter Snyder says is all however assured of changing into public, which carries the chance of authorized publicity for him in addition to the knowledge of embarrassment for the NFL. He may plead the Fifth however that may, unattainable because it might sound, solely make him look worse.

It has all the time been a thriller to me why Goodell and the NFL have fought so exhausting to guard Snyder, who has been nothing however bother for the league. Nothing that Goodell mentioned or was revealed within the listening to did something to clear that up.

Goodell acknowledged that he “didn’t recall” Snyder telling the NFL in 2009 that he was the topic of a sexual assault and harassment complaint by a former Commanders employee. That was a direct violation of the NFL’s private conduct coverage, which required “gamers, coaches, different group workers, homeowners, sport officers and all others privileged to work within the Nationwide Soccer League” to “keep away from conduct detrimental to the integrity of and public confidence within the” league.

Fairly positive asking an worker for intercourse, groping her and making an attempt to take away her garments, as the woman’s attorney said Snyder did, according to The Washington Post, would run afoul of that!

Goodell additionally admitted that he’s by no means seen an NFL operation “anyplace close to” as poisonous as Snyder’s group. Which is saying one thing, contemplating Jerry Richardson determined to promote his Carolina Panthers nearly instantly after the racism and sexual harassment there got here to gentle.

And but, Goodell held quick to his nonsensical clarification that the NFL “couldn’t” launch a written report on Beth Wilkinson’s supposedly unbiased investigation.

There isn’t a written report, Goodell mentioned, regardless of the actual fact the NFL had a written report for just about each different investigation it’s carried out. Even when it did, Goodell mentioned somberly, repeatedly, the league had promised the ladies anonymity.

Besides that Reps. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ailing., identified, the league in some way managed to concern a written report and defend peoples’ anonymity when it investigated sexual assault allegations involving the Miami Dolphins.

“The way in which that they have been granted anonymity, in case you overview the 148-page (Dolphins) report, is that their names have been redacted from that report,” Krishnamoorthi mentioned after the listening to. “So you can do the very same factor on this explicit scenario, however the NFL selected to not.”

Once more, why is that? Snyder dug in his heels on Washington’s racist nickname, solely making a change after sponsors threatened to chop ties. His rampant vanity and misogyny is a turnoff to girls, an all-important demographic if the NFL is to turn out to be that $25 billion a yr trade Goodell has predicted. His group is terrible.

And the newest scandals have left Snyder nearly no hope of getting a stadium deal in even probably the most distant nook of the DC-Maryland-Virginia space. 

“The Commanders cannot have it each methods,” Raskin mentioned. “You’ll be able to’t be always asking the general public for subsidies and funding, after which not observing primary legal guidelines that govern the office.”

Which implies Snyder has gone past a humiliation. He’s now costing his fellow homeowners cash, and that could be his one sin that even they’ll’t forgive.

The committee exhibits no signal of letting this go, and there is one other league investigation of Snyder that Goodell promised will lead to a written report. With Snyder already on trip, the NFL’s different homeowners ought to inform him to increase it. 


Observe USA TODAY Sports activities columnist Nancy Armour on Twitter @nrarmour. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.